[quote name=\'clemon79\' date=\'Jun 28 2004, 11:42 AM\'] I was discussing this with one of our fellow members, and it seems to me the appropriate way to handle this unlikely event would be to do it the same way they handled the $100K tournaments on the nighttime Clark Pyramid. That is, clearly Ken would be qualified to play in this season's ToC, since he's won enough to get in. Then, since he'd also be defending champion, he'd come back when regular play began, but he would have to re-qualify _as if he were a new player_. That is, from the standpoint of the 2005 ToC, he'd be starting with $0 and no wins. [/quote]
It sounds like what you're saying is that a decent defending champion approaching the end of the season would be eligible for two different T's of C's, and I don't think Jeopardy would want to do that. For one thing, it gives a huge opportunity to, say, a ten-day winner whose games straddled two seasons versus a ten-game winner who had the bad timing of winning her games all in the same season.
Ken is certainly creating some interesting situations for Jeopardy to think about, but this one seems simple enough. It simplifies everything if you just say that any champion who bridges a season (or whatever the T of C cutoff point is) plays in the Tournament after his loss, whenever that may be. I think having Ken (or anybody else) play in a Tournament while still the defending champion in the regular game would be awkward for the show and confusing to many viewers.