Author Topic: Barker Sued (Read 9303 times)

sshuffield70 · « **Reply #30 on:** August 18, 2004, 03:17:27 PM »

[quote name=\'clemon79\' date=\'Aug 18 2004, 11:31 AM\'] [/QUOTE]
Wow, would I quit whining about this if I were you. Tommy is precisely correct, our Fearless Leader has no jurisdiction over what Paul Harvey says between an ad for the Craftmatic bed and "Good Day"!, but he does over what's said here. [/quote]
Fearless Leader? Since when did Newton come into this thread?

chris319 · « **Reply #31 on:** August 18, 2004, 04:27:19 PM »

Posting information which would be libelous if it turned out to be false is not allowed here. Claudia Jordan has not sued Barker for sexual harrasment. That information turned out to be false, I don't care who the source is.

Paul Harvey can afford big-ticket lawyers to defend himself if he libels someone. We can't.

What's so hard to grasp about that?

MikeK · « **Reply #32 on:** August 18, 2004, 04:54:41 PM »

[quote name=\'chris319\' date=\'Aug 18 2004, 02:19 AM\'] [quote name=\'cmjb13\' date=\'Aug 17 2004, 03:34 PM\'] I'm more shocked that Bente Christensen is 50! [/quote]
She designed the P+ set 26 years ago, so that gives away both our ages. [/quote]
You're at least 26. That doesn't mean much. So are at least 5% of the members of this board. :-P

I've met Chris. He's a svelte young man who couldn't be a day over 30.

(Just make out the check to "Cash", Chris. Thanks.)

Kevin Prather · « **Reply #33 on:** August 18, 2004, 05:10:34 PM »

[quote name=\'hmtriplecrown\' date=\'Aug 18 2004, 01:54 PM\'] [quote name=\'chris319\' date=\'Aug 18 2004, 02:19 AM\'] [quote name=\'cmjb13\' date=\'Aug 17 2004, 03:34 PM\'] I'm more shocked that Bente Christensen is 50! [/quote]
She designed the P+ set 26 years ago, so that gives away both our ages. [/quote]
You're at least 26. That doesn't mean much. So are at least 5% of the members of this board. :-P [/quote]
I somewhat doubt that Chris was working on P+ when he was 1. :-P

MizzouRah! · « **Reply #34 on:** August 18, 2004, 05:18:19 PM »

Okay, make this my final, final post.

Chris, I'm not having trouble grasping anything. I'm not some 5th grade dropout that has trouble understanding. I'm totally abiding by your rules, but I have just one question...Since when is it libel to quote another's comment(when you reveal the source)?
Please answer this and I'll leave this forum to the ones who 'grasp' it best.

Thanks for your time

BrandonFG · « **Reply #35 on:** August 18, 2004, 05:40:26 PM »

[quote name=\'whoserman\' date=\'Aug 18 2004, 04:10 PM\'] I somewhat doubt that Chris was working on P+ when he was 1. :-P [/quote]
Of course not. With Chris having been a researcher for the show, there's no way he was reading from the age of 1. ;-)

clemon79 · « **Reply #36 on:** August 18, 2004, 06:32:42 PM »

[quote name=\'MizzouRah!\' date=\'Aug 18 2004, 12:10 PM\'] I would like to see Clemon79 make one positive comment about someone's post. I for one just skip by his posts because I usually know their content before reading. [/quote]
Which explains why you could make such an asinine comment. If you "skip past my posts", as you claim, you don't see the content, and therefore can't see the contributions I have made.

Now, if you want to judge me based on my overall history, that's certainly your choice, but you're a hypocrite to do that and then accuse me of "(not making) ONE positive comment"

Quote

Take your Missouri sucks comment--Was that really necessary? I have 4+ million people that might disagree, but I'm getting totally off topic.

Done solely to illustrate the need for a thicker skin, and that you are far more interested in what I have to say than you state. You already don't like me, why do you give a rip what I think of your state? Do you think I give two tin ones if someone were to post a flood of messages belittling my San Jose Sharks?

Hell, no. And you shouldn't either.

Quote

Obviously many on here think differently than I do(not that there's anything wrong with that), but I can't constantly degrade others. Enjoy your forum.

It is unfortunate that you choose to play martyr about an issue you are 100% in the wrong about. We are worse off for your absence.

chris319 · « **Reply #37 on:** August 18, 2004, 06:34:41 PM »

Quote

Since when is it libel to quote another's comment (when you reveal the source)?

Regardless of whether it's libelous or not, it is frowned upon here unless the source is more reliable than Paul Harvey who, as previously stated, could have been using the same radio prep service everyone else uses and which turned out to be in error. If the source were a wire service or a major network, newspaper or news magazine we'd be OK with it. As it is, we don't even know where Paul Harvey DID get his information -- I'm only guessing that he got it from a radio prep service.

Chris Lemon: take a happy pill and lie down for a while.

clemon79 · « **Reply #38 on:** August 18, 2004, 06:53:08 PM »

[quote name=\'chris319\' date=\'Aug 18 2004, 03:34 PM\'] Chris Lemon: take a happy pill and lie down for a while. [/quote]
Hey, I'm in a great mood. I LOVE people like this.

Kevin Prather · « **Reply #39 on:** August 18, 2004, 07:39:44 PM »

I'm just enjoying the fact that it's not me! I remember once upon a time when I was Chris's target. :-P

chris319 · « **Reply #40 on:** August 18, 2004, 10:10:21 PM »

[quote name=\'clemon79\' date=\'Aug 18 2004, 03:53 PM\'] [quote name=\'chris319\' date=\'Aug 18 2004, 03:34 PM\'] Chris Lemon: take a happy pill and lie down for a while. [/quote]
Hey, I'm in a great mood. I LOVE people like this.

[/quote]
And they love you right back.

See? Happy pills do work.

tommycharles · « **Reply #41 on:** August 18, 2004, 10:12:51 PM »

[quote name=\'chris319\' date=\'Aug 18 2004, 09:10 PM\'] [quote name=\'clemon79\' date=\'Aug 18 2004, 03:53 PM\'] [quote name=\'chris319\' date=\'Aug 18 2004, 03:34 PM\'] Chris Lemon: take a happy pill and lie down for a while. [/quote]
Hey, I'm in a great mood. I LOVE people like this.

[/quote]
And they love you right back.

[/quote]
No, he can't if he's from Missouri ;-)

Author Topic: Barker Sued (Read 9303 times)

tommycharles