Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Forums
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: PW+ question  (Read 12277 times)

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27693
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
PW+ question
« Reply #30 on: August 10, 2005, 11:33:01 PM »
[quote name=\'$100kPyramidfan\' date=\'Aug 10 2005, 08:30 PM\']I was impressed with the wide range of stars they had. Everybody from soaps to sitcom stars to broadway and even Jared Fogle, lol!
[/quote]
...about four of which who could play the game worth a damn at all...
Quote
And I was really impressed with Donny's hosting abilities,
You MUST be a troll.
Logged
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

$100kPyramidfan

  • Member
  • Posts: 59
PW+ question
« Reply #31 on: August 10, 2005, 11:45:41 PM »
No, no, no... I'm a nice guy once you get to know me. I just want to have fun here and get involved in some good old fashioned discussion about game shows is all.

(And by the way, I know Donny Osmond is no Dick Clark, of course I do!)
« Last Edit: August 10, 2005, 11:47:01 PM by $100kPyramidfan »
Logged
"Does anybody in the audience want an empty armadillo?" - Garry Moore

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27693
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
PW+ question
« Reply #32 on: August 10, 2005, 11:49:14 PM »
[quote name=\'$100kPyramidfan\' date=\'Aug 10 2005, 08:45 PM\']No, no, no... I'm a nice guy once you get to know me. I just want to have fun here and get involved in some good old fashioned discussion about game shows is all.
[/quote]
Then, while you are certainly allowed to have an opinion, you might do well to listen a while and figure out which ones will get you ridiculed and which ones will not.
Logged
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

Kevin Prather

  • Member
  • Posts: 6789
PW+ question
« Reply #33 on: August 11, 2005, 01:09:21 AM »
Come now, Chris. Thinking someone is a good game show host is hardly something to ridicule another for. Besides, being entitled to an opinion implies that they WON'T be ridiculed for it, does it not?
Logged

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27693
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
PW+ question
« Reply #34 on: August 11, 2005, 01:31:58 AM »
[quote name=\'whoserman\' date=\'Aug 10 2005, 10:09 PM\']Come now, Chris. Thinking someone is a good game show host is hardly something to ridicule another for. Besides, being entitled to an opinion implies that they WON'T be ridiculed for it, does it not?
[/quote]
"Patrick Wayne's work on TTD '90 was terribly underrated."

"Patty Deutch was a genius Match Game player."

"Ruckus is an exceptional cerebral challenge."

"Boy, I bet that Allen Ludden was a peach of a guy, since he was so nice onscreen."

Shall I go on?
« Last Edit: August 11, 2005, 01:33:24 AM by clemon79 »
Logged
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

Kevin Prather

  • Member
  • Posts: 6789
PW+ question
« Reply #35 on: August 11, 2005, 01:37:09 AM »
[quote name=\'clemon79\' date=\'Aug 10 2005, 10:31 PM\']"Patrick Wayne's work on TTD '90 was terribly underrated."[/quote]
If Patrick Wayne gives them a boner, that's their business.

Quote
"Patty Deutch was a genius Match Game player."
This isn't opinion. It's a fact that can be proved incorrect. Flame away.

Quote
"Ruckus is an exceptional cerebral challenge."
For SOME people, it is. Flame at your discretion.

Quote
"Boy, I bet that Allen Ludden was a peach of a guy, since he was so nice onscreen."
Sheer naive theory, not opinion. Flame away.

My point stands.
« Last Edit: August 11, 2005, 01:37:48 AM by whoserman »
Logged

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27693
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
PW+ question
« Reply #36 on: August 11, 2005, 01:56:44 AM »
[quote name=\'whoserman\' date=\'Aug 10 2005, 10:37 PM\']My point stands.
[/quote]
Well, no, but whatever floats your boat, pal. :)
Logged
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

Kevin Prather

  • Member
  • Posts: 6789
PW+ question
« Reply #37 on: August 11, 2005, 02:08:36 AM »
[quote name=\'clemon79\' date=\'Aug 10 2005, 10:56 PM\'][quote name=\'whoserman\' date=\'Aug 10 2005, 10:37 PM\']My point stands.
[/quote]
Well, no, but whatever floats your boat, pal. :)
[snapback]93874[/snapback]
[/quote]

I know better than to carry on a debate with you past the smiley. :)
Logged

Robert Hutchinson

  • Member
  • Posts: 2333
PW+ question
« Reply #38 on: August 14, 2005, 06:00:57 PM »
[quote name=\'clemon79\' date=\'Aug 10 2005, 09:37 PM\'][quote name=\'$100kPyramidfan\' date=\'Aug 10 2005, 07:37 PM\']That's one of the two things that really got to me about Osmond's Pyramid. Way too strict in judgment.
[/quote]
Holy good god WOW.[/quote]

It depended on what was being judged. Not taking "Things in the White House" for "Rooms in the White House" was way too strict.
Logged
Visit my CB radio at www.twitter.com/ertchin

clemon79

  • Member
  • Posts: 27693
  • Director of Suck Consolidation
PW+ question
« Reply #39 on: August 14, 2005, 06:17:34 PM »
[quote name=\'Robert Hutchinson\' date=\'Aug 14 2005, 03:00 PM\']It depended on what was being judged. Not taking "Things in the White House" for "Rooms in the White House" was way too strict.
[/quote]
Okay, I suppose that's true. But allowing Hal Sparks to write a goddamn book full of prepositional phrases was NOT strict.

So the game was strict where it shouldn't have been, and lenient where it shouldn't have been.

I think we can all agree "the judging blew" and leave it at that. :)
Logged
Chris Lemon, King Fool, Director of Suck Consolidation
http://fredsmythe.com
Email: clemon79@outlook.com  |  Skype: FredSmythe

mbclev

  • Member
  • Posts: 136
PW+ question
« Reply #40 on: August 15, 2005, 01:28:45 AM »
[quote name=\'SRIV94\' date=\'Aug 10 2005, 09:19 AM\'][quote name=\'mbclev\' date=\'Aug 9 2005, 12:46 AM\']I remember when Tom Kennedy was hosting, the password was "day" (I think) and someone said "(k)night" as a clue, and the judges automatically assumed that the clue giver said "knight".  In cases like this, the clue giver was given the benefit of the doubt.
[snapback]93684[/snapback]
[/quote]
Not that I'm trying to stir up trouble many years after the fact, but how exactly did the judges "automatically assume" that?  That seems very fishy, because unless you go out of your way to pronounce the "k" in "knight" (making it an illegal clue anyway, as the resulting sound is not a word), there's no way for the judges to assume that what the clue giver said was indeed "knight."

Doug -- and the countdown to 1400 continues
[snapback]93773[/snapback]
[/quote]

I remember Tom Kennedy actually saying essentially that the judges automatically assumed that the clue giver was saying "knight" instead of "night", as opposed to Bert Convy not saying that Constance McCashin said "allot" instead of "a lot" in 1986.
Logged

SRIV94

  • Member
  • Posts: 5517
  • From the Rock of Chicago, almost live...
PW+ question
« Reply #41 on: August 15, 2005, 06:57:37 AM »
[quote name=\'mbclev\' date=\'Aug 15 2005, 12:28 AM\']I remember Tom Kennedy actually saying essentially that the judges automatically assumed that the clue giver was saying "knight" instead of "night", as opposed to Bert Convy not saying that Constance McCashin said "allot" instead of "a lot" in 1986.
[snapback]94180[/snapback]
[/quote]
My point still stands.  It was an absolutely awful judging decision if it happened exactly as you said.  And it's still a fishy scenario--I still find no possible way you can "automatically assume" that.  Most likely it's what Chris said--Sherman was asleep at the switch.

Doug -- and the countdown to 1400 continues
« Last Edit: August 15, 2005, 07:23:12 AM by SRIV94 »
Logged
Doug
----------------------------------------
"When you see the crawl at the end of the show you will see a group of talented people who will all be moving over to other shows...the cameramen aren't are on that list, but they're not talented people."  John Davidson, TIME MACHINE (4/26/85)

Neumms

  • Member
  • Posts: 2459
PW+ question
« Reply #42 on: August 15, 2005, 10:52:19 AM »
[quote name=\'Robert Hutchinson\' date=\'Aug 14 2005, 05:00 PM\']It depended on what was being judged. Not taking "Things in the White House" for "Rooms in the White House" was way too strict.
[snapback]94166[/snapback]
[/quote]

"Rooms" is a lot more specific than "things," so I wouldn't disagree with the judging. It's simply a lousy category.

So to amend the earlier point, "the judging AND the writing blew."
Logged

BrandonFG

  • Member
  • Posts: 18598
PW+ question
« Reply #43 on: August 15, 2005, 03:04:49 PM »
[quote name=\'Neumms\' date=\'Aug 15 2005, 09:52 AM\']So to amend the earlier point, "the judging AND the writing blew."
[snapback]94197[/snapback]
[/quote]

Winner's Circle category: What Regis Philbin's Coffee Cup Might Say, and What Tom Cruise's Dentist Might Say. Enough said.
Logged
"It wasn't like this on Tic Tac Dough...Wink never gave a damn!"

Robert Hutchinson

  • Member
  • Posts: 2333
PW+ question
« Reply #44 on: August 17, 2005, 05:34:35 PM »
[quote name=\'Neumms\' date=\'Aug 15 2005, 09:52 AM\']"Rooms" is a lot more specific than "things," so I wouldn't disagree with the judging. It's simply a lousy category.[/quote]

IMO, the judge should realize at that point that it's a lousy category, and give the contestant credit.
Logged
Visit my CB radio at www.twitter.com/ertchin
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Up
« previous next »